The client instructed Counsel, Mr. Samuel Okoronkwo, to advise on a potential civil claim involving an incident at a private members’ bar. The matter concerned a group of individuals who entered the premises and were informed by a member of bar staff that the venue was for members only. The individuals were reportedly associated with the travelling community, and the exchange raised concerns about alleged discriminatory conduct and the bar’s internal policies.
The central issue was whether the refusal of service constituted discrimination or whether it was a legitimate exercise of the bar’s membership policy. The staff member involved cited prior training and management instructions to use the “members only” rule as a means of maintaining order, particularly in situations where previous groups had caused disruption. There was no recorded incident, and the individuals left without further escalation. Questions were raised about the clarity of the bar’s membership policy, the presence of signage, and the adequacy of staff training regarding refusal of service. The potential claim appeared to be financially motivated, with suggestions that compensation might be sought from the client.
Mr. Okoronkwo advised that the defence should focus on the factual account of the incident, the absence of discriminatory intent, and the operational need to maintain order within the premises. He highlighted that refusal of service must be based on conduct, not ethnicity or background, and that the “members only” policy should not be used arbitrarily. Counsel recommended reviewing internal policies, staff training procedures, and ensuring that any future refusals are properly documented. The client was advised to prepare a clear and consistent defence, supported by staff testimony and operational rationale, in anticipation of any formal claim.
Call us – Mon-Fri 8:30am – 6:30pm
+44 (0) 20 3034 0077
By submitting this form, I accept this website’s Privacy Policy