The client previously sought advice regarding a boundary irregularity at a residential property in the Arnos Grove area. Following initial legal guidance, the client received correspondence from solicitors acting for the neighbouring property, asserting that the Land Registry title plans are approximate and that the boundary has remained unchanged since their purchase 12 years ago. The neighbours indicated they may pursue an adverse possession application unless the client accepts the current boundary.
The client expressed interest in negotiating with the neighbours to acquire a portion of the disputed land for a proposed extension, suggesting he would refrain from litigation if they agreed. Counsel, Mr. Samuel Okoronkwo Jr, assessed the viability of this approach and the strength of the client’s legal position.
Counsel advised that the client’s case lacked sufficient leverage to compel a favourable negotiation, and that initiating proceedings would likely be unsuccessful due to the adverse possession claim. The financial cost of litigation would exceed the value of the land, and the client risked exposure to adverse costs if unsuccessful. Instead, counsel recommended submitting architectural drawings of the proposed extension and approaching the neighbours with a written offer to purchase the required portion of land. The client acknowledged the advice and indicated he may proceed with the extension within the existing boundary due to anticipated costs. Counsel reminded the client to obtain a Party Wall agreement and submit a planning application if the works fall outside permitted development. Further instructions are awaited.
Call us – Mon-Fri 8:30am – 6:30pm
+44 (0) 20 3034 0077
By submitting this form, I accept this website’s Privacy Policy