Call Date: 2002
To contact or instruct Denis Edwards, please call 020 3034 0077 and ask for his clerk or e-mail firstname.lastname@example.org
Denis Edwards practises in public law, EU law and commercial law. His extensive judicial review practice includes all of the fields of local government law, including planning, education law and community care.
His EU law practice includes environmental law, public procurement, VAT, the four freedoms and social security law. In addition, he has appeared in several professional negligence and commercial contracts cases, including two leading cases in Scotland on the construction of performance bonds.
Denis is also an Advocate in Scotland, where he practises from Terra Firma Chambers. He has appeared in several cases in the Court of Session in Scotland, underlining that his dual qualification is useful in cross-border cases.
Denis has represented both claimants and defendants, including central and local government in numerous judicial review claims and appeared in courts and tribunals at all levels, including the Supreme Court, House of Lords, Court of Appeal, High Court, Upper Tribunal, First Tier Tribunal and Employment Tribunal.
He has extensive experience of acting for and advising claimants and regulatory bodies in several areas governed by EU law, including VAT, health and safety at work, environmental law, data protection and information law.
Denis is also an Advocate in Scotland, where he practices from Terra Firma Chambers. He has appeared in several cases in the Court of Session in Scotland, underlining that his dual qualification is useful in cross-border cases.
‣ “Recommended for planning, education and community care matters”, Legal 500 (2016)
‣ “He has an impressive range of legal knowledge and is able to reduce things down to a level that makes things look simple”, Chambers and Partners (2016)
‣ “Notable expertise in environmental, planning, education law and community care”, Chambers and Partners (2015)
‣ LLB Glasgow University
‣ LLM Osgoode Hall Law School, Toronto, Canada
‣ Junior Counsel to the Crown (2008 – 2013)
‣ Professional Consultant, Chinese University of Hong Kong
‣ Council Member, Statute Law Society
‣ Committee Member, UK Association of European Law
‣ Saint Prix v. Secretary of State for Work and Pensions  UKSC 49
Supreme Court and ECJ: whether a pregnant woman retains “worker status” in EU law
‣ Fleming & Conde Nast! v. Commissioners for Revenue & Customs  1 WLR 195
House of Lords: concerning the supremacy of EU law over national law and the general principle that national law must respect the full effectiveness of EU law. The case was described by the Financial Times as the leading VAT case of the decade
‣ R (Brown) v. Carlisle City Council and Stobart Air Limited  EWHC 707 (Admin)
Whether planning permission ‘bought and sold’; alleged breach of EU state aid rules and EU environmental law
‣ Scottish Environmental Protection Agency v. Liquidators of Scottish Coal Limited (Court of Session, Inner House)  SLT 259
Whether liquidators have the power to disclaim environmental licences and permits held by the insolvent company; whether there can be ‘ownerless land’ in Scotland; what EU environmental law requires of domestic law on insolvency
‣ South Lanarkshire Council v. Aviva  CSOH 83
Construction of performance bond and whether bond’s condition had been satisfied by written notice
‣ South Lanarkshire Council v. Coface SA  CSIH 15
Construction of commercial contracts; construction of performance bond guaranteeing compliance with environmental obligations
‣ R (Payne and Cooper) v. Secretary of State for Work and Pensions  2 WLR 1 Supreme Court:
Test cases concerning the lawfulness of deductions from social security benefits after a Debt Relief Order is obtained
‣ Oxford Diocesan Board of Finance v. Wokingham Borough Council  EWHC 802 (Admin)
Failure of decision-maker to consider guidance and challenge to strategic environmental assessment
‣ R (M and W) v. Hounslow London Borough Council  EWHC 579 (Admin)
Meaning of ‘home’ for the purposes of a local authority’s home to school transport duties
‣ R (Rogerson) v. Secretary of State for Defence  EWHC (Admin)
Meaning of ”relevant change of circumstances” in war pensions legislation
‣ SS (Sri Lanka) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department  EWCA Civ 76 Court of Appeal:
Whether Upper Tribunal had erred in law by rejecting evidence of persecution
‣ Huhtala v. HMRC  STC 2226 &  UKFTT 79 (TC)
Whether expenses associated with a house boat used for researching and writing a book were ‘wholly and exclusively’ incurred for the purposes of trade
‣ R (Tilianu) Secretary of State for Work and Pensions  4 All ER 174 Court of Appeal:
Whether self-employed persons retain a right to reside under EU law for the purposes of claiming job seekers allowance
‣ Macaw Properties Ltd v. HMRC  UKFTT 167
Application of the Rompelman principle to finding business purposes. Case concerned the intention to convert the largest country house in England into a luxury hotel and whether expenditure incurred for preparatory acts were exempt from VAT
‣ R (P) v. Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead)  EWHC 1408 Admin
Acting for the Claimant in his successful challenge to the local authority’s decisions concerning his post-16 education
‣ West County Vending Services Ltd v. HMRC  UKFTT 124
Whether VAT chargeable on food supplies ‘on the premises’: meaning of ‘premises’ for VAT purposes
‣ Indigo Services (UK) Ltd v. Colchester Institute  EWHC 3237 (QB)
First UK case under regulation 47H of the Public Contracts Regulations, considering the appropriate test for applications to lift the automatic stay on signing an awarded public contract
‣ Jennings v. HMRC  UKFTT 49
Meaning of ‘dwelling’ for the purposes of Value Added Tax Act 1994 Sch.8 Group 5 Note 13 and its relationship with s.35 of the Act
‣ (AS) Sri Lanka v. Secretary of State for the Home Department  EWHC 1763 Admin
Intensity of judicial review over human rights claims
‣ R (D) v. Bromley IAP  EWCA Civ 1010
Natural justice in school exclusion appeals
With the constantly evolving news of the spread of COVID- 19 (“Coronavirus”), the health of staff and clients at Mercantile Barristers is paramount. We are monitoring all developments and following the Government’s guidance to ensure that we can limit any possible impact of the virus.
We are able to cater to clients’ needs by offering advice in teleconference, and Skype conference should the Government’s guidance necessitate isolated working for an unknown period of time.
To all current and prospective clients who require advice and support regarding the continued provision of our services, please do not hesitate to get in touch on 0203 034 0077 or email@example.com.
Should you also require legal advice and support on the impact of the pandemic on yourself, your employment or your business then please get in touch with us.
If you couldn't find the information you need. Please provide your details below and we will contact you.