Counsel, Mr. Samuel Okoronkwo, conducted a conference with the venue manager and the bartender involved in the incident that forms the basis of the discrimination claim brought by members of the Traveller community. The bartender confirmed that the incident occurred on 26 October in the evening. She recalled that one man approached the bar while two or three others stood back. The man asked, “Are you serving a bunch of Irish travellers?” without placing a drink order. The bartender, unfamiliar with the term “traveller” and feeling intimidated, instinctively responded “not serving today” and attempted to call her manager. The man followed her along the bar, thumped his fist, and demanded an explanation. She called the manager, but the group left before he arrived.
The bartender stated she had no prior knowledge of the Traveller community and had not received any instructions not to serve them. Her training emphasized equal treatment for all customers. She was unaware she was being recorded and believes the video was taken by one of the other men standing back. She described the man as tall, broad, with dark features and no glasses. She confirmed that had the man simply ordered a drink without intimidation, she would have served him. The manager confirmed receiving the call and immediately went to the bar. He noted that the bartender was the youngest and newest staff member on duty, and that the group appeared to target her specifically. He has extensive experience with the Traveller community over 25 years, with both positive and negative encounters. He recounted a serious incident in 2019 at another venue involving a large group causing damage and disruption. He confirmed that no similar incidents had occurred at the current premises.
The key legal issues include whether the bartender’s response constituted discrimination under the Equality Act, the intent and conduct of the claimants, and the adequacy of staff training. The factual narrative suggests that the bartender acted out of confusion and intimidation, not prejudice, and that no formal policy or instruction prohibited service to Travellers. The claimants’ approach and phrasing may be interpreted as provocative, and the absence of a drink order raises questions about their intent.
Counsel will use the witness statements to support an amended defence, emphasizing the bartender’s lack of discriminatory intent, her limited experience, and the absence of any policy against serving Travellers. The defence will argue that the claimants’ conduct was confrontational and that the bartender’s response was a reasonable attempt to de-escalate the situation by involving her manager. Counsel will also prepare a Part 18 request for further information and continue to build a factual narrative that challenges the claimants’ version of events.
Call us – Mon-Fri 8:30am – 6:30pm
+44 (0) 20 3034 0077
By submitting this form, I accept this website’s Privacy Policy