PUBLIC LAW CASE STUDIES

Please see below some examples of our Public Law case studies. If you wish to make any further enquiries or consult our barristers, please click here.

PUBLIC LAW CASE STUDIES

Please see below some examples of our Public Law case studies. If you wish to make any further enquiries or consult our barristers, please click here.

R (Payne and Cooper) v. Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2012] 2 WLR 1 Supreme Court:

Test cases concerning the lawfulness of deductions from social security benefits after a Debt Relief Order is obtained

Oxford Diocesan Board of Finance v. Wokingham Borough Council [2013] EWHC 802 (Admin)

Failure of decision-maker to consider guidance and challenge to strategic environmental assessment

R (M and W) v. Hounslow London Borough Council [2013] EWHC 579 (Admin)

Meaning of ‘home’ for the purposes of a local authority’s home to school transport duties

R (Rogerson) v. Secretary of State for Defence [2012] EWHC (Admin)

Meaning of ”relevant change of circumstances” in war pensions legislation

SS (Sri Lanka) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 76 Court of Appeal:

Whether Upper Tribunal had erred in law by rejecting evidence of persecution

Huhtala v. HMRC [2011] STC 2226 & [2012] UKFTT 79 (TC)

Whether expenses associated with a house boat used for researching and writing a book were ‘wholly and exclusively’ incurred for the purposes of trade

R (Tilianu) Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2011] 4 All ER 174 Court of Appeal:

Whether self-employed persons retain a right to reside under EU law for the purposes of claiming job seekers allowance

Macaw Properties Ltd v. HMRC [2012] UKFTT 167

Application of the Rompelman principle to finding business purposes. Case concerned the intention to convert the largest country house in England into a luxury hotel and whether expenditure incurred for preparatory acts were exempt from VAT

R (P) v. Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead) [2010] EWHC 1408 Admin

Acting for the Claimant in his successful challenge to the local authority’s decisions concerning his post-16 education

West County Vending Services Ltd v. HMRC [2010] UKFTT 124

Whether VAT chargeable on food supplies ‘on the premises’: meaning of ‘premises’ for VAT purposes

Indigo Services (UK) Ltd v. Colchester Institute [2010] EWHC 3237 (QB)

First UK case under regulation 47H of the Public Contracts Regulations, considering the appropriate test for applications to lift the automatic stay on signing an awarded public contract

Jennings v. HMRC [2010] UKFTT 49

Meaning of ‘dwelling’ for the purposes of Value Added Tax Act 1994 Sch.8 Group 5 Note 13 and its relationship with s.35 of the Act

(AS) Sri Lanka v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWHC 1763 Admin

Intensity of judicial review over human rights claims

R (D) v. Bromley IAP [2007] EWCA Civ 1010

Natural justice in school exclusion appeals

VALUE ADDING APPROACH

Our approach to legal practice is always to articulate creative and value-adding solutions for clients whilst delivering timely, efficient and affordable professional services. All clients conduct their affairs within a legal context and Mercantile Barristers’ role is to advise on the conduct of their transactions and affairs in ways that avoid conflict and disputes.

 

However, should a dispute become inevitable, then our prior engagement would have assured that all the necessary precautions have been taken and mitigating steps adopted. Thus, clients will begin any dispute resolution in a strong position to achieve their desired objectives.

 

Whether by adjudication, arbitration, litigation, members at Mercantile Barristers will adopt a firm, swift and decisive approach to achieve the best possible results for clients within the shortest possible time. We recognise that no two cases are the same, so we will adapt our style to suit the occasion.

MAKE AN ENQUIRY

    We do not undertake legal aid work, free consultations nor work on a no win, no fee basis.

    Please prove you are human by selecting the Cup.

    MAKE AN ENQUIRY

      We do not undertake legal aid work, free consultations nor work on a no win, no fee basis.

      Please prove you are human by selecting the House.

      VALUE ADDING APPROACH

      Our approach to legal practice is always to articulate creative and value-adding solutions for clients whilst delivering timely, efficient and affordable professional services. All clients conduct their affairs within a legal context and Mercantile Barristers’ role is to advise on the conduct of their transactions and affairs in ways that avoid conflict and disputes.

       

      However, should a dispute become inevitable, then our prior engagement would have assured that all the necessary precautions have been taken and mitigating steps adopted. Thus, clients will begin any dispute resolution in a strong position to achieve their desired objectives.

       

      Whether by adjudication, arbitration, litigation, members at Mercantile Barristers will adopt a firm, swift and decisive approach to achieve the best possible results for clients within the shortest possible time. We recognise that no two cases are the same, so we will adapt our style to suit the occasion.

      To find out more about how Chambers’ working practices have evolved to cope with Covid-19, please click here.

      X