disputes on your project

Samuel Okoronkwo On How To Avoid Disruption Disputes

By Samuel Okoronkwo

Projects delivered on time, within budget and to high standards are an employer’s dream. Yet projects have a tendency to generate disputes that destroy otherwise lucrative commercial relationships across the supply chain. The Technology and Construction Court exists to resolve these disputes. But what causes them and how can they be avoided?


Of the three pillars of time, cost and quality, time is the hardest to control according to Samuel Okoronkwo and is the cause of many disputes. A vital tool in project management is a well-resourced, time-sequenced and logic-linked contract programme that defines the critical path of the construction activities, identifies key milestones and locks in the completion date. The contracts administrator (CA), who could be the architect, engineer or project manager does almost everything else.


Thus, the burden of preventing disruption and delays degenerating into a dispute falls on the CA. They must determine whether the contractor is entitled to EOT or liable to pay LAD. In doing so, the CA must not consider themselves partisan as the employer’s hired hand and should discharge this function objectively and expeditiously. They should notify contractors of any employer risk event and invite their earliest response.



Contractors must assist the CA by flagging every delaying event, along with an objective assessment of the impact on the critical path and completion. While it appears to be counterintuitive, it is almost always to the contractor’s credit when, notwithstanding an employer risk event for which they could claim EOT with compensation, they nevertheless produce a revised construction programme that protects the completion date.


The CA and the contractor should always be prepared to deal with disruptions contemporaneously, rather than let them fester in the hope that the completion date is still achievable or that EOT issues are best addressed at the end. When this approach is adopted, a dispute requiring the attention of expert contentious lawyers whether in adjudication, arbitration or litigation often becomes inevitable.


Remember, if you are faced with a construction dispute, Mercantile Barristers will be happy to assist. Do use the enquiry form below to contact us to discuss your matter further.


Value Adding Approach

Our approach to legal practice is always to articulate creative and value-adding solutions for clients whilst delivering timely, efficient and affordable professional services. All clients conduct their affairs within a legal context and Mercantile Barristers’ role is to advise on the conduct of their transactions and affairs in ways that avoid conflict and disputes.


However, should a dispute become inevitable, then our prior engagement would have assured that all the necessary precautions have been taken and mitigating steps adopted. Thus, clients will begin any dispute resolution in a strong position to achieve their desired objectives.


Whether by adjudication, arbitration, litigation, members at Mercantile Barristers will adopt a firm, swift and decisive approach to achieve the best possible results for clients within the shortest possible time. We recognise that no two cases are the same, so we will adapt our style to suit the occasion.


Make An Enquiry

By submitting this form, I accept this website’s Privacy Policy